1 Finance Magazine
Your trusted source for unbiased and holistic personal finance research
© 2024, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Equity Linked Savings Scheme (ELSS) performance over that of Public Provident Fund (PPF) seems to be quite an obvious choice while investing for tax deductions under Section 80C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, that existed in 2009.
We have studied the data of all the ELSS funds that existed in 2009.
As personal finance is supposed to be hyper-personalised, let us try and find out if you should invest in ELSS or PPF.
ELSS funds invest in equities and are eligible for a deduction of taxable income as part of the various options available under the Section 80C limit.
Typically, the returns of equities are higher than those of fixed-income options such as PPF or EPF.
This leaves investors with two thoughts about whether they should choose the volatile ELSS or the stable PPF/PF for their investment.
However, the answer is way beyond this number game, which we’ll answer later in this article. But let's first look at how investing ₹1,50,000 each year on April 1st of each financial year would’ve yielded in PPF versus each category of ELSS funds.
Corpus After An Investment of ₹1.5 Lakhs in PPF Each Year For The Last 15 Years:
Financial Year | Number of months | Interest rate | Deposit in ₹ | Interest in ₹ | Corpus at period end in ₹ Lakhs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009-10 | 12 | 8.1% | 150,000 | 12,075 | 1.62 |
2010-11 | 12 | 8.0% | 150,000 | 24,966 | 3.37 |
2011-12 | 8 | 8.0% | 150,000 | 25,976 | 5.13 |
2011-12 | 4 | 8.7% | - | 14,792 | 5.27 |
2012-13 | 12 | 8.7% | 150,000 | 58,969 | 7.36 |
2013-14 | 12 | 8.7% | 150,000 | 77,150 | 9.64 |
2014-15 | 12 | 8.7% | 150,000 | 96,912 | 12.11 |
2015-16 | 12 | 8.7% | 150,000 | 118,393 | 14.79 |
2016-17 | 6 | 8.1% | 150,000 | 65,984 | 16.95 |
2016-17 | 6 | 8.0% | - | 67,809 | 17.63 |
2017-18 | 3 | 7.9% | 150,000 | 37,782 | 19.51 |
2017-18 | 6 | 7.8% | - | 76,081 | 20.27 |
2017-18 | 3 | 7.6% | - | 38,511 | 20.65 |
2018-19 | 6 | 7.6% | 150,000 | 84,185 | 23.00 |
2018-19 | 6 | 8.0% | - | 91,983 | 23.92 |
2019-20 | 3 | 8.0% | 150,000 | 50,831 | 25.92 |
2019-20 | 9 | 7.9% | - | 153,600 | 27.46 |
2020-21 | 12 | 7.1% | 150,000 | 205,616 | 31.02 |
2021-22 | 12 | 7.1% | 150,000 | 230,865 | 34.83 |
2022-23 | 12 | 7.1% | 150,000 | 257,906 | 38.90 |
2023-24 | 12 | 7.1% | 150,000 | 286,867 | 43.27 |
Note: An investment of only ₹1 lakh p.a. was allowed in PPF before April 1, 2014. Similarly, the Section 80C limit was also enhanced. However, to avoid confusion and clearly communicate the message, these two factors have not been considered.
Thus, investing ₹1.5 lakhs p.a. would’ve made a corpus of ₹43.27 lakhs so far. There’s no tax on redemption if the redemption request is made after 15 years of opening the account.
However, let us now look at the performance of ELSS funds.
Corpus After An Investment of ₹1.5 Lakhs in Each ELSS Fund Each Year For The Last 15 Years:
S.No. | Name of the Fund | Post Tax Corpus in ₹ Lakhs | As a Multiple of PPF Corpus |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Quant ELSS Tax Saver Fund(G) | 134.7 | 3.1 |
2 | Bank of India ELSS Tax Saver-Reg(G) | 105.6 | 2.4 |
3 | Bandhan ELSS Tax Saver Fund-Reg(G) | 101.8 | 2.4 |
4 | DSP ELSS Tax Saver Fund-Reg(G) | 100.5 | 2.3 |
5 | Canara Rob ELSS Tax Saver-Reg(G) | 92.3 | 2.1 |
6 | Invesco India ELSS Tax Saver Fund(G) | 91.2 | 2.1 |
7 | Franklin India ELSS Tax Saver Fund(G) | 91.2 | 2.1 |
8 | JM ELSS Tax Saver Fund(G) | 90.3 | 2.1 |
9 | ICICI Pru ELSS Tax Saver Fund(G) | 89.4 | 2.1 |
10 | Kotak ELSS Tax Saver Fund(G) | 88.7 | 2.0 |
11 | Sundaram ELSS Tax Saver Fund-Reg(G) | 87.2 | 2.0 |
12 | HDFC ELSS Tax saver(G) | 85.2 | 2.0 |
13 | Baroda BNP Paribas ELSS Tax Saver Fund-Reg(G) | 82.9 | 1.9 |
14 | HSBC ELSS Tax saver Fund-Reg(G) | 80.7 | 1.9 |
15 | Nippon India ELSS Tax Saver Fund(G) | 80.1 | 1.9 |
16 | Taurus ELSS Tax Saver Fund-Reg(G) | 77.3 | 1.8 |
17 | Quantum ELSS Tax Saver Fund-Reg(G) | 76.5 | 1.8 |
18 | Edelweiss ELSS Tax saver Fund-Reg(G) | 75.2 | 1.7 |
19 | UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund-Reg(G) | 71.5 | 1.7 |
20 | Aditya Birla SL ELSS Tax Saver Fund(G) | 71.4 | 1.6 |
21 | LIC MF ELSS Tax Saver-Reg(G) | 69.7 | 1.6 |
Note 1: Gains on equity-oriented funds (including ELSS) were made taxable from April 1, 2018. However, as per Section 55(2)(ac), the cost base of mutual funds acquired April 1, 2018, was allowed to be the market value of these funds on January 31, 2018 (simplified explanation).
Note 2: Section 80C limit was revised in 2014. However, for the sake of avoiding confusion, it has been assumed that ₹1.5 Lakhs p.a. were invested in each ELSS scheme
The results are startling. The worst performing tax saver fund generated a corpus of ₹69.7 lakhs against ₹43.27 lakhs of corpus generated in PPF. Whereas, the best-performing ELSS fund generated a corpus of ₹134.7 lakhs post-tax.
So it is a no-brainer to select any ELSS fund over PPF, right? No, the answers in personal finance are never “one-size fits all” and, thus, can’t really be templatized.
It can make sense when you are already not significantly exposed to equity and are not contributing significant sums of your regular income in equity.
An investor must diversify their investments across products after consulting their qualified financial advisors.
There would be hardly any genuine, qualified financial advisor who would recommend you always keep more than 90% of your sums in equity and allocate nothing to debt. Asset allocation is quite critical when it comes to money management.
After allocating sums to the Employee Provident Fund (since its yields are higher than PPF), one may consider allocating sums to PPF for their debt allocation as 7.1% p.a. returns, albeit fluctuating, are tax-free. To compare it with a debt fund or a corporate bond would be wrong, as the latter come with some sort of credit risk and fluctuate based on interest rate fluctuations.
Even though PPF is way more safe than the latter, on a pre-tax basis (assuming a 30% slab rate for investors), the yields of PPF should be compared with bonds yielding 10.35% p.a., that too without considering the aforementioned risks. Unfortunately, bonds/debt funds yielding that much come with a lot more risk than PPF, as the capital recovery also gets questioned.
Moreover, an investor may, most likely, not withdraw sums from their PPF account during the 15-year tenure due to their stringent lock-in conditions.
However, the same may not be the case with ELSS funds, as they are redeemable after a lock-in of 3 years only.
An investor may, therefore, feel jittery and withdraw sums in between the 15-year period and withdraw sums and not invest sums on April 1 each year
We haven’t really seen the strongest of bear markets. Markets remained flat for almost 12 years, from the highs of 1992 until 2004. Similarly, these past returns may not repeat if India or the entire world gets to face some prolonged uncertain circumstances.
Hence, it is always prudent to allocate sums to various asset classes after considering each person’s personal risk profile and goals.
Table of Contents
Share: